Monday, October 3, 2011

Feedback from the NELA Town Hall on September 22, 2011

These comments were received from the Northeast Los Angeles Coalition (NELA) members at their September 22, 2011 meeting.

Training Motion

  • All Board members should have to take Treasurer Training to understand the necessary rules and documentation
  • The rules are overwhelming so training should be boiled down to principles instead and not mandated because there is no value
  • Board members will voluntarily take training if available and meaningful
  • Have videos instead of forcing people to take tests
  • Each Neighborhood Council should decide the consequences, but Treasurer Training should be mandated - the rest of the training is too much for functioning Neighborhood Councils since they are busy doing community work
  • Would lose potential people if too much training, but maybe they should be lost if they don't want to take the training and be informed - what is suggested is the minimum of what Board members should know
  • Losing voting rights as a consequence is good because Board members need training - all organizations have training
  • Make training easy and online
  • Mandated training won't fix bad people
  • Training should be taken by candidates before they even get on the Board
  • Training should be pleasurable with different learning methods
  • Training should be mandated because the more people know, the more people will hold one another accountable since the ones who need it don't go
  • Training should not be mandated because Board members are volunteers and not paid City employees
Grievance Motion
  • Grievances need to have statues of limitation
  • Current consequences for grievances don't pass muster
  • The General Manager should be involved to handle grievances as to whether they are legitimate or not - the Department is shirking its responsibilities
  • An independent group needs to handle grievances rather than the Board since one Neighborhood Council experienced sixteen grievances that the Board members and stakeholders filed against one another - there should be one grievance panel in each planning region of the city and a random sample of people who review them
  • Ask stakeholders to look at grievances 
  • Not good to ask stakeholders to look at grievances beyond their community because they won't know the issues
  • People who review the grievances must be trained
Regional Governance Motion
  • Help and assistance from other Neighborhood Councils would be great
  • Put everything online as much as possible
  • Regional administration help is good since it would help with training people since the temp agency quality is spotty
  • This would be an administrative blessing to NC's that could be a building block to functional regional system and should not be limited to just administrative services, but should not include political influence
  • Should not confuse this with alliances which has a different purpose
  • Don't see how this system would help the City save money
  • This system would help create a synergy around common issues and groups, such as website, elections and money going out the door because Neighborhood Councils are reinventing the wheel
  • Great foundation for the system
  • Very useful to have administrative hub and common language and standards from help and would not overburden the Neighborhood Council operations
Funding Motion
  • Should be no roll over at all since the money should go to the neighborhood to promote different groups in the community
  • Neighborhood Councils are too focused on the money and acting like Santa Claus - forgetting the purpose of the Neighborhood Council is grass roots democracy
  • Don't do an all or nothing roll over since it cause Neighborhood Councils to frantically spend down and waste money
  • Money is a divisive issue in Neighborhood Councils - should give basic administrative money and put the remaining money into grants to have them apply directly
  • Any swept funds for grants should stay within the regions or well educated areas will get all the money
  • Project specific rollover funds are good because often get matching funds from other   City departments
  • Money has caused Neighborhood Councils to become old political machines where favors can be bought for lunches
  • Board members need to be trained how to say no to money requests
  • Funding should have application forms that teach people what the Neighborhood Councils can fund
  • Money is a problem because friends of the Board members are getting coached how to properly submit requests so their funds go through - distracts the members
  • City Council is not listening to the Neighborhood Councils and are setting them up to bleed Neighborhood Councils of their funds

No comments:

Post a Comment

Just a reminder - if you are a Board member and if your Neighborhood Council Board is taking a position on the reforms, please do not comment here because it may cause a serial meeting under the Brown Act. Also, this blog is moderated so your comments may not immediately appear. Please give us up to 24 hours to post your comments. Comments will be edited only to remove potentially libelous and offensive language, e.g. curse words. Thank you for your comments and cooperation!